THESE were the ante-union days. Negotiations for union 
      were being carried on between the church of Scotland in Canada, popularly 
      known as the Kirk, and the Canada Presbyterian Church. The issue was still 
      doubtful, and for all who were desirous of seeing one great Presbyterian 
      Church in the Dominion, it was a time of great anxiety. As is almost 
      always the case, the danger to the cause of union and the delay in its 
      consummation arose not so much from essential differences in foundation 
      principles, but from local and often personal rivalries and jealousies, 
      the very existence of which was one of the strongest arguments for union. 
      Throughout the whole of Canada the greatest interest was taken by 
      Presbyterians in the discussions, and in many places intense feeling was 
      aroused. This was true of the congregation of Knox Church, in far-away 
      Winnipeg. Here, though the congregation had been formally received by the 
      Presbytery of Manitoba and was, therefore, a congregation of the Canada 
      Presbyterian Church, there was a very influential portion of the 
      congregation adhering to the Kirk who naturally were anxious to secure the 
      greatest advantage possible for their own party. The result was strife 
      which only became more bitter as the congregation grew in strength by 
      accessions from the East, and as the prospects of union became more and 
      more cloudy.
      With the congregation in this condition, Mr. Robertson 
      took charge. It was a situation requiring the guiding of a man of strong 
      common sense, of fairness, and of a high 
      sense of duty. And it is no small tribute to Mr. 
      Robert. son that he was not found wanting. He takes his wife into his 
      confidence in regard to affairs in the congregation as follows:
      "Things here are not in a good state. The two parties 
      in the church are quite distinct, and they are likely to continue so, as 
      far as I can judge. They have been jealous of each other all along, and 
      the prospect of a failure of union in June is having an influence just 
      now. I am afraid that both parties were for union on the condition that 
      things should be more or less in their own hands. It was perhaps 
      unfortunate that four-fifths of the congregation should be Canada 
      Presbyterians and the remaining part only belonging to the Kirk, but so it 
      is. The most of the Kirk party are men of influence and respectability, 
      while the other party, although having several men of wealth and high 
      social standing, are more or less socially below them. This has had its 
      influence. It became with the Kirk party a question of patronage because 
      of their position, etc., and to this the other would not submit. It looked 
      as if the former were saying, ‘We will give respectability and social 
      standing to the church, we will give considerable cash, too, but you must 
      let us have things our own way, and get our minister in the church.’ The 
      other party could not be expected to do that, and here they took issue. I 
      believe this question has a great deal to do with the present state of 
      things.
      "Some time ago elders were chosen, 
      and organization was asked and granted by the Manitoba Presbytery. This 
      gave offense, because by this action the congregation became connected 
      with the Canada Presbyterian Church. The Old Kirk party could not accept 
      office as elders because to do so, since the church is in connection with 
      the Canada Presbyterian Church, they must join that Church. This they 
      could not do. The congregation drew up a constitution and came to 
      presbytery to sanction it. Presbytery did so, and this again was another 
      grievance. Dr. Clark then was sent for by the Kirk party in a quiet way, 
      to come up here and it was supposed that in the general chaos he would be 
      elected pastor, because supposed to be superior to anything here. This, 
      too, failed. Then again Dr. Clark was sent away and I was taken in here to 
      preach. I told them that I was not a candidate present or prospective for 
      the pulpit, and that if they gave a call to Dr. Clark or anybody else, I 
      was prepared to resign my position to-morrow, but that I would and could 
      not in deference to anybody, give Dr. Clark the pulpit now. I came here to 
      supply the pulpit and no other did so, at the request of the congregation, 
      at personal sacrifice—congregational and family sacrifice—and if they 
      would not agree to fulfill their part of the arrangement, I would at once 
      go away—I represent the Church in Canada and could not yield to Old Kirk 
      or any other.
      "The whole of the Canada 
      Presbyterian people are of one mind in having me here. The Governor and 
      the other party come to church regularly, and I am on good terms with 
      them. I am only blamed, I suppose, because I happen to be acceptable as a 
      preacher. It is exceedingly unpleasant, but I suppose I must make the best 
      of it."
      Sensible man he is, but none the 
      less is the situation vexing to his soul. Through the weeks that follow 
      the unhappy squabble goes on. Meantime, the congregations are growing in 
      numbers and the services in interest, so he wisely resolves to keep out of 
      the trouble and let the parties fight out their foolish petty fight 
      between themselves. And indeed, there is no need for him to interfere, for 
      both parties appear to be under sufficiently able generalship.
      "I am happily not in the matter at 
      all," he writes under date April 30th, 1874. "The difficulty is between 
      themselves and Professor B—. He has been working in the interests of our 
      Church, as he ought, but still for the common good. The other party 
      thought he was doing for the Canada Presbyterian Church altogether. Hence, 
      everything was looked on with suspicion." It was a condition fruitful in 
      mutual misunderstanding, the most innocent deeds and words being 
      misinterpreted, as witness, "The late trouble was with Dr. Clark. It 
      appears that Professor B— in speaking to Dr. Clark, said that if this 
      contention and strife were to continue, that if there was no way of peace, 
      it was the opinion of some men in the congregation that it would be better 
      to separate. The Doctor then asked who they were that would be apt to go. 
      Professor B— replied that he did not now know, he only knew those who were 
      Old Kirk in their antecedents. This was only what any person might have 
      said. The construction put on his words is, that the Canada Presbyterian 
      Church party wish the others to leave the church, which is quite another 
      matter. Feeling has run high about this whole matter for a week or two; 
      now all other grievances are not thought of in comparison with this last. 
      I do not think they will go off.
      "I am personally and as a preacher 
      not in the case at all. I understand that even Mr. McM— who is the head of 
      the other party, speaks very favourably of my preaching. Governor Morris 
      still attends. He was there last Sabbath and I had quite a chat with him 
      after service was over. He appears to be a quiet nice man. If he was alone 
      there would be no trouble. It is a great pity Dr. Clark is here at all." 
      With which all will devoutly agree.