| THE year 1860 was 
		marked by two notable events—the visit of mf H. R. H. the Prince of 
		Wales, and the Anderson Extradition Case. The first of these took place 
		early in September, and was occasion of festivities on a scale seldom, 
		if ever, equalled in Toronto. The Prince, accompanied by the Duke of 
		Newcastle, Colonial Secretary, the Governor-General, Sir Edmund Head, 
		and a numerous suite, reached Toronto from the east on the 7th of 
		September. For days and weeks previous the citizens had been busy with 
		preparations to do honour to the Royal visitor; a series of magnificent 
		triumphal arches had been erected on the streets, flags and bunting in 
		immense quantities had been purchased, addresses had been drawn up, 
		programmes of banquets and entertainments prepared—in fact neither 
		trouble nor expense had been spared to make Toronto's reception of the 
		Prince a brilliant and splendid affair. At half-past six o'clock in the 
		evening of the 7th of September the steamer Kingston, with the Roval 
		party on board, reached the landing-place at the foot of John Street, 
		where a huge amphitheatre had been erected and was now crowded by 
		thousands of the wealth and fashion of the city. The roadway from the 
		landing-place to the Esplanade—where a handsome arch had been 
		erected—was also lined with tiers of seats, in which not a vacant space 
		was to be found, while the entire neighbourhood was black with eager and 
		loyal people, who, undaunted by the threatening aspect of the sky, had 
		turned out to do honour to the city's Royal guest. As the Kingston 
		approached the wharf a storm of cheers broke from the assembled 
		multitudes. The Prince, on leaving the steamer, was received by the city 
		magnates, and an address of welcome was read by the Major, Mr. Wilson. 
		When the Prince had replied, over a thousand children of the Public and 
		Sunday schools, who had been specially trained for the occasion, raised 
		the strains of the National Anthem. The Prince and the Governor-General 
		were driven to Government House, which had been specially prepared for 
		their reception. In the evening the city was brilliantly illuminated, 
		and the royal party drove through the streets amidst the cheers and 
		acclamations of a vast crowd. The Globe, speaking of the illuminations 
		at the time declared that" As a whole it is doubted if the display of 
		that night was ever excelled in America in extent, variety, and 
		brilliancy of decoration. Speaking of the arches the same journal 
		remarked: "The arch erected on the crest of the amphitheatre at the 
		landing will be a lasting monument to the fame of its designer, Mr. 
		Storm. Fine as were the arches erected at Quebec, Montreal and Ottawa, 
		the finest of them could not for a moment enter into competition with 
		it.'" It would be impossible, 
		in the space at our disposal, to give anything like an account of the 
		festivities during the Prince's stay—from the 7th to the 12th. The 
		entire six days, were one prolonged. The principal features of this 
		carnival time were a levé at Osgoode Hall, a regatta on the bay, a 
		review of the active militia force, a visit to the University, and the 
		formal opening of the Horticultural Gardens by His Royal Highness, who 
		planted there a young maple which still flourishes, though no longer 
		young. During his visit the Prince also made a huried trip to 
		Collingswood, and on the 12th bid the city farewell. The only untoward event 
		which occurred during the Prince's stay was a foolish escapade by a few 
		young hot-heads who assembled on Colborne Street and burnt in effigy the 
		Duke of Newcastle and Sir Edmund Head. The objects of the demonstration 
		having set their faces against the exuberant Orange decorations at 
		Kingston and Belleville, the effigy-burners resorted to this method of 
		expressing their dissatisfaction. The second event which 
		signalized the year 1860—the Anderson Case —was one which will long be 
		remembered for the intense interest it awakened throughout the length 
		and breadth of Canada, and scarcely less in Great Britain. Anderson was 
		a runaway slave from Missouri, who, while making his way to Canada, slew 
		a man named Diggs, who was in pursurt with intent to capture him. In 
		April, in the year mentioned, a man who had tracked Anderson to this 
		country caused his arrest for murder, with a view to extradition. The 
		case came up at the Michaelmas Term of the Court of Queen's Bench, on a 
		writ of habeas corpus, Anderson being defended by leading members of the 
		Bar—for such was the excitement throughout the country that funds poured 
		in for his defence. The decision of the Court—one of the three Judges 
		dissenting—was in favour of the surrender of the prisoner. Anderson's 
		counsel, however, determined to .make a further effort, and a writ of 
		habeas corpus was obtained from the Court of Queen's Bench in England to 
		bring the prisoner before the Judges there. 
		 RUSSELL ABBEY.
 A decision in his 
		favour from that quarter being beyond a doubt. A conflict between the 
		British and Canadian Courts seemed imminent, but fortunately was avoided 
		by the issue of a third writ of habeas corpus from the Upper Canadian 
		Court of Common Pleas, which liberated the prisoner upon a technicality, 
		without entering into the merits of the case. The excitement which had 
		prevailed while Anderson's case was still stib judice was only equalled 
		in intensity by the rejoicings over his release. The coloured community 
		was especially jubilant; but the whole of Canada, Great Britain, and 
		even New England, shared in their satisfaction. The breaking up of the 
		ice in the Don in the spring of the following year (1861) solved a 
		mystery which for sixteen months had seemed impenetrable. A battered, 
		bruised and partially decomposed body was discovered in the water near 
		the mouth of the little river, entangled in some weeds. Upon examination 
		it was identified as that of John Sheridan Hogan, a prominent Toronto 
		journalist and Reform member of the Legislature for the County of Grey, 
		who had unaccountably disappeared in December, 1859. No end of theories 
		had been broached to account for his disappearance— among others that he 
		had tied to the United States to avoid the importunities of his 
		creditors ; but the idea that he might have been foully dealt with does 
		not seem to have struck the public mind. Such, however, upon 
		investigation, proved to have been the case. From the evidence it 
		appeared that on the night of his disappearance the murdered man crossed 
		the Don bridge in pursuance of an intention to visit a friend who lived 
		on the Kingston Road. When in the act of crossing the bridge he was 
		accosted by a woman who engaged him in conversation, while a second 
		female struck him on the head with a stone placed in the foot of a 
		stocking. Both women belonged to a notorious band of ruffians who 
		infested a wood on the east side of the Don—from which they took their 
		name, the Brooks' Bush Gang. Other members of the gang then came up, a 
		considerable sum of money was taken from the body of the murdered man, 
		and the body itself was thrown over the bridge railing into the river. 
		Although several members of the gar were arrested, there can be no 
		manner of doubt that the really guilty parties escaped punishment, while 
		a comparatively innocent man underwent the extreme penalty of the law. 
		One of the ruffianly set turned Queen's evidence, others succeeded in 
		proving an alibi, while one, named Brown, less successful, was found 
		guilty and hanged. Brown, although present at the murder, does not seem 
		to have had any actual hand m it. The revelations at the trial had the 
		effect of completely dispersing the gang, one member of which, 18 an 
		infamous woman, is now said to be a notorious resident of Buffalo. 
		Another member, also a woman, was, until comparatively lately, an inmate 
		of Toronto gaol. The year 1861 witnessed 
		the death of William Lyon Mackenzie, one of the most prominent figures 
		in the history of the city of which he was the first Chief Magistrate. 
		The story of the great agitator's declining years is a sad one. From the 
		time of his return to Toronto in 1849, he continued to reside there till 
		his death, supporting himself chiefly by journalism. From 1851 to 1858 
		he represented the County of Haldimand in the Provincial Legislature, 
		but in the latter year he resigned his seat, and devoted himself 
		entirely to the management of his journal, Mackenzie's Weekly Message. 
		The profits, however, were small, and the editor's life was one of 
		hardship, debt, and deprivation. Some of his Reform friends, becoming 
		aware of his unfortunate situation, opened a subscription—ostensibly for 
		the purpose of presenting him with a testimonial in recognition of his 
		services; really with the object of relieving his necessities—not an 
		easy object to attain without wounding his feelings of independence and 
		self-respect. A considerable amount was raised, and with a portion of 
		this a house and lot on Bond Street were purchased and presented to Mr. 
		Mackenzie. Another sum was handed to him as a loan—nominally, of 
		course—by the subscription committee; bur as no small part of this was 
		employed by him in paying debts, it was not long before he was again in 
		distress. But the end was not far off. Utterly broken down in body and 
		mind, careless of the approach of death, refusing medical aid, the great 
		Reformer gradually sank, till, on the 28th of August, death put an end 
		to the restless, busy life—within less than four years of the allotted 
		span of three-score and ten. Towards the close of 
		1861, Toronto was in a ferment. The seizure of the Confederate envoys, 
		Messrs. Mason and Slidell, on board the British mail steamer Trent, had 
		just taken place, and every one was discussing the probabilities of a 
		war with the United States. The entire population seemed to burn with a 
		sudden military ardour; thousands of volunteers enrolled themselves as 
		recruits ; drill was a regular every day matter; new companies. were 
		added to existing regiments ; and speculations were freely indulged in 
		as to the probability of Toronto becoming the great military centre for 
		Upper Canada, and even a naval station, in view of the probability of 
		operations by water. Sympathy with the South, in which, previous to the 
		Trent affair, the citizens of Toronto, like Canadians generally, were by 
		no means a unit, now became general, and a war with the United States 
		would have been extremely popular. Happily there was no occasion to put 
		to the test the enthusiasm of Canadians; the Confederate envoys were 
		surrendered, and the excitement in Toronto, as elsewhere, cooled down. 
		But the seed had been sown, the emergency had taught the people a 
		lesson; and from the crisis brought about by the Trent affair, the 
		military spirit which has given Canada its present militia force may be 
		said to date. Outside of the events 
		just related, the local history of Toronto from i860 to 1865 was that of 
		the proverbial happy country that has no history. The close of the 
		decade of the fifties had witnessed commercial depression, stagnation in 
		trade and manufactures, starvation and misery. The first half of the 
		decade of the sixties brought commercial vigour, activity in trade and 
		manufactures, abundance and prosperity. It was the story of Pharaoh's 
		reversed. The cause of this state of things was to be looked for in the 
		American civil war. The country was overrun with commissariat agents 
		purchasing stores for the army. American gold poured in, in a stead) 
		stream, and produce of all kinds could not be supplied with sufficient 
		rapidity to meet the demand. Farmers and merchants—wholesale and retail— 
		reaped a golden harvest, and many a fortune was accumulated by trader 
		and speculator. Toronto of course had its share of the general activity, 
		and the condition of the city, in those days when war prices ruled, was 
		one of unexampled prosperity. We now come to one of 
		the saddest chapters in the whole of Toronto's history—a story of events 
		winch threw the entire city into mourning. During the morning of Friday, 
		the 1st of June, 1866, intelligence was received mi the city that a body 
		of one thousand Fenians had crossed the Niagara River at Black Rock, 
		landed near Fort Erie, and were ravaging the country in the Vicinity. 
		Regular troops were at once despatched to the spot, and the city 
		volunteers were called upon to furnish their quota to repel the invader. 
		It was now that the military spirit evoked among the citizens during the 
		Trent excitement came into play. The call was promptly responded to, and 
		by two o'clock in the afternoon a force of six hundred men of the 
		Queen's Own—many of them University students— had embarked on board the 
		steamer City of Toronto, which was to convey them across the lake. The 
		force was under the command of Major Gillmor, and consisted mainly of 
		young men. With what happened on the banks of the Niagara River we have 
		nothing to do here—it is matter of Canadian history, with which every 
		Canadian is familiar. A conflict took place at Ridgeway, the brunt of 
		which had to be borne by the volunteers, owing to the failure of the 
		regulars to put in an appearance 111 time, and some of the Toronto 
		contingent lost their lives on the battle-field. The news, in an 
		imperfect form, reached the city on the Sabbath morning and it was a sad 
		Sabbath that the Toronto people spent. A writer m the 'Varsity for June 
		2nd, 1883, gives the following graphic description of that memorable 
		day: "That Sunday was one such as Toronto had never seen before. The 
		most contradictory rumours were afloat m the city, /he churches 
		presented a most extraordinary spectacle. Instead ot the usual 
		attendance of quiet worshippers-of the hymn of praise, the calm 
		discourse-the attendant throng was assembled in deep humiliation and 
		earnest prayer. I doubt whether a single sermon was preached in Toronto 
		that day. Excited people came rushing into the churches and announcing 
		the latest news from the front. Then a prayer would be offered up by the 
		pastor, or the congregation would bow their heads in silent 
		supplication. The merchants, on lord being received that the volunteers 
		were suffering from want of food, ransacked their warehouses for 
		supplies to be sent to the front by the steamer that was to go to Port 
		Palhousie that afternoon for the dead and wounded; and all the young men 
		were hastening to the from. About ten o'clock that 
		night the steamer above alluded to, with her mournful freight, reached 
		the Yonge Street wharf, where an immense throng had congregated, and 
		where several hearses and stretchers borne by men of the 47th Regiment 
		were in waiting. A writer in the Globe of the following day thus 
		describes the scene on board the steamer: "At one end of the vessel lay 
		arranged together the rough coffins enclosing the dead. Near the other, 
		laid on couches and shakedowns, tenderly and thoughtfully cared for, 
		were the wounded. No word of complaint escaped them as they were 
		severally moved by strong arms and feeling hearts to the cab or the 
		stretcher., as their case might require. Ten were .severely wounded and 
		were carefully sent to the hospital; the. remainder were sent to their 
		respective homes. While the wounded were being thus disposed of, the 
		dead were deposited in hearses and carried to their several 
		destinations. The coffins in which they were enclosed were formed of 
		rough plain timber, the name of the sleeping occupant being chalked on 
		the cover." The following are the names of ihe dead who were brought to 
		the city: Ensign Malcolm McEachren, No. 8 Company, Q.O.R.; Private 
		Christopher Alderson, No. 7 Company; Private William Fairbanks Tempest, 
		No. 9 Company; Private Mark Defries, No. 3 Company; and Private William 
		Smith, No. 3 Company. On the following 
		Tuesday, the 5th, the remains of the five heroes were accorded the 
		honours of a public funeral. During the forenoon of that day the five 
		bodies lay in state in the Drill-shed, which was draped m black, the 
		coffins being covered by flags. About four o'clock the procession 
		started for the cemetery, headed by the band of the 47th Regiment. 
		Following the private mourners came the funeral committee, the troops— 
		regular and volunteer—the mayor and corporation, and a long procession 
		of citizens on foot and in carriages. All the shops were shut, the bells 
		tolled, the streets were lined by silent crowds, many people wearing 
		badges of mourning. And so the solemn procession wended its way to St. 
		James's Cemetery, where the bodies were committed to the earth. A week after the 
		funeral two of the wounded, Sergeant Hugh Matheson and Corporal F. 
		Lackey, of No. 2 Company, Queen's Own, succumbed to their injuries. They 
		also were buried with public honours. In addition to these, two other 
		members of the regiment, who were not residents of Toronto, had fallen 
		on the battle-field, and were burled at the places to which they 
		respectively belonged. Thus the total death-roll of the Queen's Own on 
		this fatal occasion was nine. It is almost unnecessary to add that their 
		devotion to their country was suitably honoured. Pensions were granted 
		by the Province to the bereaved widows and orphans, and the monument in 
		the Queen's Park—of which a description will appear hi its proper 
		place—testifies to the loving regret with which the country cherishes 
		the memory of her devoted sons. The Chief Magistrate of 
		the city in these stirring times was Mr. Francis H. Medcalf, who had 
		succeeded Mr. Bowes in 1864, and who retained office until the close of 
		1866. In the latter year the municipal law of the Province again 
		underwent a change. The election of mayors in cities by popular vote was 
		discontinued, and a return was made to the system of election by the 
		Council. The office of councilman was also abolished, and three aldermen 
		were allowed to each ward. The first Mayor of Toronto elected under the 
		new Act was Mr. James E. Smilh, in 1867. |